Re: 3494, multiple tsm's connected, balancing media
2001-02-14 17:58:53
Snyder.John [Snyder.John AT CANADATRUST DOT COM] wrote:
>This configuration should allow us to "rebalance" the number of scratch
tapes between the different servers as required. (ie: if I need to move
some tapes from server A to server B, I don't need to peel and stick any
volser labels!) So far, so good...and something I've done occasionally
in the past.
>However, when we use DRM and insert tapes into the 3494 that have
returned from offsite, when we do a checkin for these returned volumes
(using "checkin libv MYLIB stat=scr search=yes devtype=3590 checklabel=no"),
all of the returned media gets checked into the one TSM server that issued
the checkin.
....................
Or script the checkin process. I had the script check the volid's against
the volhist file to see if was volume that was "ours", and only issue
checkins against those that matched. I kept the volhist forever to keep
stats on volume usage, etc. I used mtlib to get a list of inserted tapes.
You would also need to account for "new" scratch tapes that might need
labeling...
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- 3494, multiple tsm's connected, balancing media, Snyder.John
- Re: 3494, multiple tsm's connected, balancing media,
Richard Cowen <=
- Re: 3494, multiple tsm's connected, balancing media, Davidson, Becky
- Re: 3494, multiple tsm's connected, balancing media, Nicholas Cassimatis
|
Previous by Date: |
Re: 3590E, Talafous, John G. |
Next by Date: |
Re: 3494, multiple tsm's connected, balancing media, Davidson, Becky |
Previous by Thread: |
Re: 3494, multiple tsm's connected, balancing media, Kyle Payne |
Next by Thread: |
Re: 3494, multiple tsm's connected, balancing media, Davidson, Becky |
Indexes: |
[Date]
[Thread]
[Top]
[All Lists] |
|
|