Re: licensing of TSM
2000-11-22 09:25:29
Subject: |
Re: licensing of TSM |
From: |
Richard Sims <rbs AT BU DOT EDU> |
Date: |
Wed, 22 Nov 2000 09:24:32 -0500 |
>I posted a similar question and got no answer to it if ou get one please let
>me know.
As another list member pointed out, the invocation may need full path
specification of the license file.
A further possibility is that the file system where the server lives
may be full. The server has historically failed to detect this, and
annoyingly just parrots the unchanged number of licenses because it
could not write its output license file into that file system.
If the server developer responsible for this code is monitoring ADSM-L,
we'd appreciate having this minor code change made to the server to
handle such conditions.
Richard Sims, BU
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- licensing of TSM, Shekhar Dhotre
- Re: licensing of TSM, Marc Layne
- Re: licensing of TSM, James Healy
- Re: licensing of TSM,
Richard Sims <=
- Re: licensing of TSM, Shekhar Dhotre
- Re: licensing of TSM, Prather, Wanda
- Re: licensing of TSM, Shekhar Dhotre
- Re: licensing of TSM, Shekhar Dhotre
- Re: licensing of TSM, Shekhar Dhotre
- Re: licensing of TSM, Prather, Wanda
- Re: licensing of TSM, Shekhar Dhotre
- Re: licensing of TSM, Shekhar Dhotre
|
|
|