ADSM-L

Re: AW: Tivoli TMS (ADSM) vs Veritas Netbackup

2000-11-03 08:52:09
Subject: Re: AW: Tivoli TMS (ADSM) vs Veritas Netbackup
From: Ray Schafer <schafer AT TKG DOT COM>
Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2000 13:52:42 +0000
"Klatt, Michael" wrote:

> http://www.keylabs.com/results/veritas/veritas.html

Intersting...  The test doesn't seem to test real world scenarios.  I wonder
why they didn't test network backup and restore.  I wonder why they tested
client and server on the same machine - how many people do that?  Only one test
went to a disk cache, the rest were directly to tape.  Did they use client side
compression on TSM?  That would affect CPU and througput - especially on the
same machine.

I would like to see a test of the products in a scenario that matches how the
products are used on a daily basis over time.  For example, after measuring
backup times each day for a month in a controlled environment, how do they
compare?


--
Ray Schafer       |    schafer AT tkg DOT com     |    http://www.tkg.com
Ray Schafer       |    schafer AT tkg DOT com     |    http://www.tkg.com
The Kernel Group <=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-> Core Confidence for E-Business
 TKG's Bare Metal Restore can re-build your machine from the ground
   up with a single command - using the data stored in TSM (ADSM)
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>