I'm still getting used to the way Tivoli organizes things.  I've installed
what was in LATEST from .../maintenance/...  Should I get the latest from
.../patches/... instead?


At 09:40 AM 9/12/2000 -0400, you wrote:
>What version of TSM 3.7.?.? What operating system. We are using Windows NT
>with TSM version 3.7 on our server and a combination of 3.7.1.0 and
>3.7.2.01 on the clients (I am slowly getting rid of the 3.7.1.0 clients due
>to the fact that the exclude statements are ignored.) Going to release
>3.7.2.01 als fixes several other problems with 3.7.1.0 (I think I have a
>copy of what PMR's release 3.7.2.01 has if you like)
>
>Sean Duffy
>Network Analyst
>Alcatel Canada TA
>
>mailto:Sean.Duffy AT tas.alcatel DOT ca
>
>
>
>
>                     Fred Johanson
>                     <fred AT MIDWAY DOT UCH        To:     ADSM-L AT 
> VM.MARIST DOT EDU
>                     ICAGO.EDU>              cc:
>                     Sent by: "ADSM:         Subject:     Excludes in TSM
>                     Dist Stor
>                     Manager"
>                     <[email protected]
>                     T.EDU>
>
>
>                     09/11/00 12:56
>                     PM
>                     Please respond
>                     to "ADSM: Dist
>                     Stor Manager"
>
>
>
>
>
>Last week, I upgraded my server to TSM V3R7.  The client had been TSM for
>months and seems to have had no problem with the exclude file, which looks
>like
>
>EXclude  /adsmdb/.../*
>EXclude  /adsmlog/.../*
>EXclude  /adsmstgpool1/.../*
>EXclude  /adsmstgpool2/.../*
>
>         ...
>
>EXclude  /adsmarch/.../*
>
>I'd done an incremental before the upgrade and the occupancy for V3R1 was
>about 4Gb.  After the upgrade, I started another incremental.  I waited a
>reasonable length of time and I checked: 4Gb and still going.  It kept
>going all afternoon, and the q sess showed 10Gb, 15Gb, etc.  It was still
>run when I got home and it ran all night.  The next morning, q sess showed
>100Gb and counting.  Q fi showed that it had processed a 30Gb and a 18Gb
>storagepool.  What led me to cancel was the q occ of the node, which showed
>that the process had backedup both storage pools and was starting on the
>DB.  The pattern of the excludes has been working since V2R1, but suddenly
>something seems to have gone wrong.  Have I missed something?
>
>
>Fred Johanson
>System Administrator, ADSM
>S.E.A.
>University of Chicago
>773-702-8464

Fred Johanson
System Administrator, ADSM
S.E.A.
University of Chicago
773-702-8464

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This message and any attachment is confidential and may be privileged or 
otherwise protected from disclosure.  If you have received it by mistake please 
let us know by reply and then delete it from your system; you should not copy 
the message or disclose its contents to anyone.
This message and any attachment is confidential and may be privileged or 
otherwise protected from disclosure.  If you have received it by mistake please 
let us know by reply and then delete it from your system; you should not copy 
the message or disclose its contents to anyone.