ADSM-L

[no subject]

2015-10-04 17:27:37
This might be a dumb question - in which case apologies.

Has anyone got any good reason why we shouldn't go directly
from ADSM 3.1.2.50 server (AIX) to TSM 4.1, missing out the TSM3.7 step?

Just wondering if there were any 'gotchas' that meant it was better to do the
upgrade as ADSM->v3.7->v4.1. Obviously if it's do-able in one step we'd prefer
that.

Any contributions gratefully received.

Regards

Bob Cross.


* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
This message is confidential.  It may also be privileged or
protected by other legal rules.  It does not constitute an
offer or acceptance of an offer, nor shall it form any part
of a legally binding contract.  If you have received this
communication in error, please let us know by reply then
destroy it.  You should not use, print, copy the message or
disclose its contents to anyone.

E-mail is subject to possible data corruption, is not
secure, and its content does not necessarily represent the
opinion of this Company.  No representation or warranty is
made as to the accuracy or completeness of the information
and no liability can be accepted for any loss arising from
its use.

This e-mail and any attachments are not guaranteed to be
free from so-called computer viruses and it is recommended
that you check for such viruses before down-loading it to
your computer equipment.  This Company has no control over
other websites to which there may be hypertext links and no
liability can be accepted in relation to those sites.

Scottish & Newcastle plc
Registered in Scotland, Registered Number 16288
Registered Office: 50 East Fettes Avenue, Edinburgh, EH4 1RR
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

--Boundary_(ID_1OhjtDVgNGeXXjS9Mx1HpA)--
=========================================================================
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • [no subject], Unknown <=