Re: Incremental Forever
2000-05-01 16:00:07
Subject: |
Re: Incremental Forever |
From: |
Doug Fuerst <djfirst AT LI DOT NET> |
Date: |
Mon, 1 May 2000 16:00:07 -0400 |
I'd be interested in that too, as I can't imagine a reason to do
incrementals forever. Generally, you do fulls every week (OK, at least on
mainframes, there, I said it.) Then you incremental during the week, and
full again on the weekend.
At 13:18 01-05-00 -0400, you wrote:
Anybody know of any document that explains in detail what the theory is behind
the "incremental forever" backup method. I constantly get asked why we
don't do
full backups.
If you respond please respond to my e-mail as well as the list.
Thanks,
Jack
Doug Fuerst
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Incremental Forever, Jack Palmadesso
- Re: Incremental Forever,
Doug Fuerst <=
- Re: Incremental Forever, Richard Sims
- Re: Incremental Forever, Kauffman, Tom
- Re: Incremental Forever, Allen S. Rout
- Re: Incremental Forever, MIKE HANLEY
- Re: Incremental Forever, Kelly Lipp
- Re: Incremental Forever, Nick Laflamme
- Re: Incremental Forever, Dirk Billerbeck
- Re: Incremental Forever, Richard L. Rhodes
- Re: Incremental Forever, Doug Fuerst [mailto:djfirst
- Re: Incremental Forever, ADSM : Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L
|
|
|