Re: bad performance restoring very small nt-directories
2000-03-30 06:21:25
Subject: |
Re: bad performance restoring very small nt-directories |
From: |
Andreas Boesler/bebit/LNN/DE <aboe AT BEBIT.BUB DOT DE> |
Date: |
Thu, 30 Mar 2000 13:21:25 +0200 |
Thank you Richard,
TESTFLAG DISABLENQR resolves my problems.
In which situation should I NOT USE TESTFLAG DISABLENQR ?
In which situation should I USE TESTFLAG DISABLENQR ?
Andreas.
> Andreas - In addition to my ADSM-L posting, here's another APAR I found:
>
> IX87848: PERFORMANCE PROBLEM RESTORING SMALL NUMBER OF FILES FROM A NESTE
> D SUBDIRECTORY
>
> ORIGINATING DETAILS:
> Traversing down multiple sub directories and then issuing
> a restore on a small number of files can result in a delayed
> start of the restore if the program decides to go through
> the No Query Restore path. This customer has seen a delay
> of 40 minutes until the restore started.
> After enabling the TESTFLAG DISABLENQR (and thus going
> through the Classic Restore path), restore started with
> acceptable delay.
> Richard
|
|
|