Re: ADSM to be or not to be
2000-02-23 12:42:10
On 23 Feb 00, at 16:17, Robinson, Cris wrote:
> final thought...
> If you go to Arcserve, good luck there!, or legato and such you will have to
> change the backup platform. If you are ready to do that anyway why not port
> *SM to the new platform and see how it goes before investing in a new
> product. Again, what is the tape storage media?
>
We currently run Legato for Unix backups and Archserv ror NT and
Netware backups. Were currently doing a proof-of-concept pilot to
evaluate *SM as a replacement for both.
Just a different perspective!
Rick
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Richard L. Rhodes e: rhodesr AT firstenergycorp DOT com
Richard L. Rhodes e: rhodesr AT firstenergycorp DOT com
Ohio Edison Co. p: 330-384-4904
f: 330-384-2514
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- ADSM to be or not to be, Doherty, John (ANFIS)
- Re: ADSM to be or not to be, Robinson, Cris
- Re: ADSM to be or not to be, Talafous, John G.
- Re: ADSM to be or not to be, Larry Way
- Re: ADSM to be or not to be, Richard Sims
- Re: ADSM to be or not to be, Angelo DeAngelis
- Re: ADSM to be or not to be, Angelo DeAngelis
- Re: ADSM to be or not to be, Angelo DeAngelis
- Re: ADSM to be or not to be,
Richard L. Rhodes <=
- ADSM to be or not to be, ANFIS
|
|
|