Re: ADSM to be or not to be
2000-02-23 11:45:04
Could you provide more information about your mainframe environment? Tape
technology in use?
OSA hardware attached to your mainframe?
We did a review of backup/recovery technology last year. Evaluated ALL the
products we could get our hands on. For many reasons that I won't bother the
list with, the final decision came between Veritas and *SM. Veritas is a
VERY expensive software outlay. Depends on how many nodes you are dealing
with.
In our case, TWICE the cost of an IBM Network Storage Manager supporting 150
nodes. Also, less flexible.
We are currently running ADSM on our mainframe. We are going to be bringing
in an IBM NSM to port the ADSM solution to TSM on the IBM-3466. E-mail me
directly with your questions and we can discuss.
Good luck, but I doubt seriously you will find a better solution than *SM.
John G. Talafous Sr. Tech. Prog/Anal
The Timken Company Phone: (330)-471-3390
P.O. Box 6927 Fax : (330)-471-4034
1835 Dueber Ave. S.W.
Canton, Ohio USA 44706-0927
talafous AT timken DOT com http://www.timken.com/
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- ADSM to be or not to be, Doherty, John (ANFIS)
- Re: ADSM to be or not to be, Robinson, Cris
- Re: ADSM to be or not to be,
Talafous, John G. <=
- Re: ADSM to be or not to be, Larry Way
- Re: ADSM to be or not to be, Richard Sims
- Re: ADSM to be or not to be, Angelo DeAngelis
- Re: ADSM to be or not to be, Angelo DeAngelis
- Re: ADSM to be or not to be, Angelo DeAngelis
- Re: ADSM to be or not to be, Richard L. Rhodes
- ADSM to be or not to be, ANFIS
|
|
|