Yes, definitly there was discussions about 3.1.2.50 problem sometime back.
That is why I chose not to go with 50.  

Steven P Roder <tkssteve AT REXX.ACSU.BUFFALO DOT EDU> wrote:
> You are recommending NOT to upgrade to version 3.1.2.40 or 3.1.2.50 of the
> ADSM server?
>
> What is wrong with 3.1.2.50?

I do not remember the specifics, but I do recall seeing problems with
level 50 discussed here, which is why I am staying at 42.

Steve Roder, University at Buffalo
VM Systems Programmer
UNIX Systems Administrator (Solaris and AIX)
ADSM Administrator
(tkssteve AT buffalo DOT edu | (716)645-3564 | 
http://ubvm.cc.buffalo.edu/~tkssteve)


____________________________________________________________________
Get free email and a permanent address at http://www.netaddress.com/?N=1