ADSM-L

Re: Assigning different management classes??

2000-01-25 12:54:43
Subject: Re: Assigning different management classes??
From: "Bates, Richard" <Richard.Bates AT VERTEX.CO DOT UK>
Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2000 17:54:43 -0000
Steve,

To which domain does your node belong?  NT_DOMAIN or ROD_DOMAIN?

Did you use the dom=<domain> option when you registered the node?

If your node belongs to ROD_DOMAIN then you cannot use management classes
which belong to NT_DOMAIN.

Richard.

=====================================
Technical Services (ADSM) - Dawson House
Int: 33298  Ext: 01925 233298
=====================================

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rolph, Steve, ITS [SMTP:Stephen.Rolph AT JOCOKS DOT COM]
> Sent: 25 January 2000 17:10
> To:   ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
> Subject:      Re: Assigning different management classes??
>
> Thank you for the reply Kelly.
>
> I do have the policy sets activated. Maybe I am expecting to see something
> that does not apply to this.  I have different storage pools associated
> with
> the different management classes.  I am expecting to see the data that I
> am
> sending to the management class pointed to by the INCLUDE statement go to
> the storage pool associated with that management class.  It does not.  It
> all goes to the pool associated with the policy domain assigned to that
> node
> at registration time.
>
> On the client gui there is drop down management class option.  The only
> class available on that drop down option is the management class
> associated
> with the policy set established at node registration.  Is there any case
> (way) to have more than one class available to the node?  Would it show up
> on that clients gui and be selectable?  If not, why is it a pull down
> seemingly selectable option?
>
> Every query I have performed tells me I am using the DEFAULT management
> class.  DEFAULT to what?  Do I just trust that it is getting to the proper
> management class I have assigned in the INCLUDE statement?
>
> The attachment has printouts of the policies I am trying to use.  ROD is
> the
> registered policy set for this particular node.  NT is the management set
> I
> am trying to force certain data to via the INCLUDE statement.  They each
> have different storage pools associated to them.
>
>  Any ideas would be greatly appreciated
>
> note: the nightly_class on the original email should be nt_class
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kelly Lipp [mailto:lipp AT STORSOL DOT COM]
> Sent: Monday, January 24, 2000 3:17 PM
> To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
> Subject: Re: Assigning different management classes??
>
>
> After you created the new management class, did you activate the policy
> set
> containing that class?  This is the most common problem.  After you
> activate
> the set, do an incremental backup of the client in question.  This will
> cause the files being backed up to be rebound to the new class.
>
> Kelly J. Lipp
> Storage Solutions Specialists, Inc.
> PO Box 51313
> Colorado Springs CO 80919
> (719)531-5926
> Fax: (719)260-5991
> www.storsol.com
> lipp AT storsol DOT com
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU]On Behalf Of
> Rolph, Steve, ITS
> Sent: Monday, January 24, 2000 9:07 AM
> To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
> Subject: Assigning different management classes??
>
>
> For a particular Node I have set a policy group (ROD_DOMAIN, ROD_CLASS) to
> handle certain files a particular way.  When I display the management
> class
> of a particular file backup it shows DEFAULT as the management class.
> There
> are other files on the same node that I want to force to another
> management
> class, I do so by using the following:
>
> INclude g:\homedirs\...\*.* nightly_class
>
> NIGHTLY_CLASS has different retention, copy, and storage attributes.  When
> I
> query those files it shows DEFAULT as the management class, and it appears
> to have gone to the ROD_DOMAIN Storage pools.  How do I know if any of the
> management class attributes from the NIGHTLY_CLASS are being used on
> homedirs files?
>
> Thanks in advance
>
> Stephen R. Rolph
> Systems Programmer
> Information Technology Services
> Johnson County, Kansas
>  << File: A2.txt >>


**********************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify
the system manager.

This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by
MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses.

www.mimesweeper.com
**********************************************************************
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>