Here are two that described problems with NT:
Aug 24 Joshua Bassi (6,625) Re: ADSM Bottleneck
Sep 3 Jordan, Chris (ELS (3,872) Re: ADSM Bottleneck
There are others who spoke in favor of NT.
In our case, because we need the Extended Device Support which is very
expensive and priced per server coupled with the scalability of Unix, Unix
seems the better choice.
On Thu, 13 Jan 2000, Joshua S. Bassi wrote:
> David,
>
> Take a look at the ADSM List archives from a few months ago - this issue
> was discussed in detail then:
>
> www.adsm.org
>
>
> --
> Joshua S. Bassi
> Senior Technical Consultant
> Symatrix Technology, Inc.
> jbassi AT gloryworks DOT com
> (503) 702-3371
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU]On Behalf Of
> Dave Canedo
> Sent: Thursday, January 13, 2000 8:42 AM
> To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
> Subject: advantages of UNIX server over WinNT
>
>
> I am just reading up documentation before installing ADSM and am
> hoping someone can point me to docs that lists advantages or
> disadvantages of UNIX over NT servers.
>
> thanks,
> --
> David C. Canedo | E-mail davec AT psw DOT com
> PSW Technologies | Phone 512.342.3502
> Austin, Texas | Information Technology Group
>
|