Separate pool for each client vs. One pool with collocation
1999-11-05 10:12:28
Subject: |
Separate pool for each client vs. One pool with collocation |
From: |
Liyan Cao <Liyan.Cao AT CHARMING DOT COM> |
Date: |
Fri, 5 Nov 1999 10:12:28 -0500 |
The problem using one pool is: we've three 3570 tape libraries and they can't be
defined within one pool.
---------------------- Forwarded by Liyan Cao/BEN/FB/CSI on 11/05/99 09:16 AM
---------------------------
---------------------------
Thomas.Denier AT mail.tju DOT edu on 11/05/99 10:26:26 AM
Thomas.Denier AT mail.tju DOT edu on 11/05/99 10:26:26 AM
To: Liyan Cao@Charming America
cc: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU @ INTERNET
Subject: Separate pool for each client vs. One pool with collocation
> Does anybody have a suggestion on :
> > separate pool for each client so we'll have 33 pools
> vs.
> 5 pools, each pool for the clients on same platform with collocation on?
Is there any particular reason for not using one pool with collocation on?
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Separate pool for each client vs. One pool with collocation, Liyan Cao
- Separate pool for each client vs. One pool with collocation,
Liyan Cao <=
- Separate pool for each client vs. One pool with collocation, Thomas Denier
- Re: Separate pool for each client vs. One pool with collocation, Keenan Stratton
- Re: Separate pool for each client vs. One pool with collocation, Doug Thorneycroft
- Re: Separate pool for each client vs. One pool with collocation, Steve Fletcher
- Re: Separate pool for each client vs. One pool with collocation, Liyan Cao
- Re: Separate pool for each client vs. One pool with collocation, Remeta, Mark
- Separate pool for each client vs. One pool with collocation, ADSM : Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L
- Re: Separate pool for each client vs. One pool with collocation, Steve Fletcher [mailto:sfletcher
|
|
|