Re: Antwort: Difference between mount point & drive
1999-11-04 08:20:31
Subject: |
Re: Antwort: Difference between mount point & drive |
From: |
"Moir,Betsy" <betsy.moir AT ABBOTT DOT COM> |
Date: |
Thu, 4 Nov 1999 07:20:31 -0600 |
Thanks, Mecki. I think I've got it now. A "drive" represents a physical
device, but "mount points" are related to the number in the mountlimit
parameter. So I could have any number of drives designated for ADSM use, but
if my mountlimit was set to only 1 I would still only be able to access one
tape at a time. Have I got that right?
ADSM-L AT vm.marist DOT edu on 11/04/99 02:07:56 AM
Please respond to ADSM-L AT vm.marist DOT edu @ INTERNET
To: ADSM-L AT vm.marist DOT edu @ INTERNET
cc:
Subject: Antwort: Difference between mount point & drive
Hi Betsy,
if you have a deviceclass of file you will only define a directory in that
deviceclass.
In that directory you might have up to 256 files that can be simultaneously
accessed
according to the mountlimit value of that deviceclass.
In this case a file is treated like a sequential volume - "mounted"
The Admin Guide in this case is really confusing cause a storage pool is
only working with
a deviceclass and there you might have a mountlimit of 1 or only one drive
in a library with a
mountlimit of drives.
For a copy process you will need enough mount points available - a drive
being used by another process is physically there but there's no mount
point available from that drive.
Hope this helps a little to understand why a mount point and a drive are
not the same.
Regards
Mecki
|
|
|