Re: Destroyed tape
1999-09-17 02:47:06
Richard,
just to be more precise about your previous mail.
Do you actually keep 2 copy storage pool? One offsite and on onsite?
I'm using 3590 which never let me down and offsite, for me, means just
another building (being the campus quite wide!). So I can get hold of the
copy tapes in minutes.
Apart from Murphy laws ... aren't 2 copy excessive? There are indepth
reasons to have a Local Copy?
Thank you
Mauro, STM
> Just to clarify my previous note...
>
> Doing a DELete Volume of a primary storage pool volume will cause the
> files represented on that volume to be logically deleted from ADSM,
> meaning gonzo from your offsite storage pool backups as well.
> The fate of files in the Primary pool governs their reflected fate
> in the subservient pools.
> Richard Sims, BU
>
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Destroyed tape, Jordan, Chris (ELS)
- Re: Destroyed tape, bbullock
- Re: Destroyed tape, Richard Sims
- Destroyed tape, Richard Sims
- Re: Destroyed tape, Kelly J. Lipp
- Re: Destroyed tape,
Mauro M. TINELLI <=
- Re: Destroyed tape, Richard Sims
- Re: Destroyed tape, Richard C. Dempsey
- Re: Destroyed tape, Nick Cassimatis
- Re: Destroyed tape, Kelly J. Lipp
- Re: Destroyed tape, Allen S. Rout
- Re: Destroyed tape, bbullock
- Re: Destroyed tape, Prather, Wanda
- Re: Destroyed tape, Richard Sims
- Destroyed tape, ADSM : Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L
- Re: Destroyed tape, ADSM : Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L
|
|
|