[no subject]
2015-10-04 17:39:21
Hi Stefan. You captured my attention about your comments
regarding the backup throughputs. What do you consider a
good throughput. Our server is currently capable of transferring
1.5GB in 6minutes over a High Speed switch. The network data
transfer rate is 10,104 KB/sec while aggregate data transfer rate
is 4,292 KB/sec. Do you think we can get better performance?
Perhaps 1.5GB in 3minutes? Comments or suggestions are
appreciated.
Angel
-----Original Message-----
From: Stefan.Dusedau [SMTP:Stefan.Dusedau AT VIACOM DOT COM]
Sent: Tuesday, September 14, 1999 10:44 AM
To: ADSM-L
Cc: Stefan.Dusedau
Subject: Re: SQL BACKTRACK for SYBASE
Actually I would be worried about through put for both backups.
Getting
12gig/hour on a local backup is not what I would consider good. Have
you
spoken with BMC about this at all? We get about 12gig/hour over the
network
to ADSM.
-----Original Message-----
From: Burton, Robert [mailto:ROBERT.BURTON AT ROYALBANK DOT COM]
Sent: Tuesday, September 14, 1999 2:46 PM
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Subject: SQL BACKTRACK for SYBASE
We are running Sybase version 11.02 on a HP machine. We are trying
to back
this up via Backtrack to
our ADSM 3.1.2.40 aix version 4.2 server.
When we natively backup from the HP server we get 3-4 m/s
When we use the SQL BACKTRACK software from BMC we are getting 1-1.4
m/s
Is there anybody out there that is using Backtrack and if there is
can you
give us
any suggestions as to why we are seeing such bad performance.
Is there any options we can check to try to improve our throughput
numbers...
Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated...
thanks
Robert Burton
Open Systems Storage Analyst
Royal Bank of Canada
(416) 348-3849
Robert.Burton AT RoyalBank DOT com
--openmail-part-0e05f760-00000001--
=========================================================================
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread> |
|
|
|