Hello , my problem is solved , it was a bug (see apar PQ21866) in ADSM
1) IBM support center give me the following LINK EDIT :
>>
>> Cust uses TCP/IP from INTERLINK.
>> He need to RELINK the TSO Admin:
>>
>> //SYSLMOD DD DSN=ADSM.V3.LINKLIB,DISP=SHR
>> //SYSLIB DD DSN=INTELINK.CILIB,DISP=SHR
>> // DD DSN=CEE.SCEELKED,DISP=SHR
>> //SMPLTS DD DSN=SMPE.MVS.SMPLTS,DISP=SHR
>> //SYSLIN DD *
>> INCLUDE SMPLTS(ANSADM)
>> INCLUDE SYSLIB(A0PERR)
>> INCLUDE SYSLIB(STRERROR)
>> INCLUDE SYSLMOD(ANSADM)
>> ALIAS DSMADMC
>> MODE AMODE(31),RMODE(ANY)
>> SETCODE AC(0)
>> ENTRY SVMSTART
>> NAME ANSADM(R)
>> /*
>> ***********************************************************
>
2) ADSM lose the TCPPORT number
description 'APAR PQ21866
>>
>>Hello,
>>your first problem, the tso admin client getting the rc -59 matches
>>apar PQ21866. A brief desciption of the apar follows :
>>--------
>>IF THE TCPPORT OPTION IS PLACED BEFORE THE ICSSNAME OPTION IN
>>THE OPTIONS FILE, THE TCPPORT . WILL BE INTERPRETED AS ZEROS.
>>---------
>>PROBLEM SUMMARY:
>>****************************************************************
>>* USERS AFFECTED: *
>>All users if the Version 3 TSO Admin Client.
>>****************************************************************
>>* PROBLEM DESCRIPTION: *
>>The TSO Admin Client is unable to connect to the server using
>>the Interlink support because the port number is invalid.
>>Even tho the port number is specified in the TCPPORT statement
>>correctly, it is not valid when it is used.
>>PROBLEM CONCLUSION:
>>The TCPPORT number was being overlayed with blanks when the
>>ICSSNAME value was placed in a control block. The code
>>assumed the ICSSNAME value to have a length of 8 instead of
>>4. Code was change so that the correct length is used.
>>With this change, the order of the TCPPORT and ICSSNAME
>>option statements is not relevant.
>>
>>Bonne réception, et bon wek end
>>Bruno DUVAL
>>
>>
>
|
