ADSM-L

Re (2): DEC-Unix 3.1 Client <-> automounter, ufs, nfs

1999-07-05 09:27:41
Subject: Re (2): DEC-Unix 3.1 Client <-> automounter, ufs, nfs
From: Reinald Gf|llner <gfullner AT BATIAN.LPR.E-TECHNIK.TU-MUENCHEN DOT DE>
Date: Mon, 5 Jul 1999 15:27:41 +0200
Hi Richard,

thanks for your reply.

      ---------------------------------------------------------------
       follow the path given by the argument of dsmc, don't leave the
       filesystem from nowon and treat what you find there as distinct
       file"space"
      ---------------------------------------------------------------

So if I got you right, this is what adsm is *not* able to do ?
And that's no bug but a feature ??




(1)     This means: I'm not supposed to use own namespace-concepts
        like automouonter-maps underneath adsm

        ---------------------------------------------------------------
         -> adsm and automounter are incompatible
        ---------------------------------------------------------------

        To distinguish "local" from "network"space seems usefull in
        M$- but not necessaryly in an Unix-Enviroment.


(2)     This seems very clearly to be a bug:
                - You specify a starting-path for an archive
                - no symlink crosses this startingpoint
                -> adsm searches the filesystem downward AND upward !
                -> following every symlink from above the startingpoint
                   it covers the whole nfs-cluster.

                   "archive" does something the dsm-browser had shown
                   and that is not even is consequent within the
                   concept of seperate "local" and "network" space.


(3)     Yes, that is what I would expect adsm to do:
        treat os-defines filesystems 1:1 als seperate filespaces

        According to my experience however adsm by default seems to
        define the first part of the path-string as filespace.
        Trying to force a seperation by using "virtualmountpoint"
        results in duplicate/indistinguishable entries in the
        dsm-browser.


btw: do the ibm-folks also read this list ?



Reinald

      ---------------------------------------------------------------
       follow the path given by the argument of dsmc, don't leave the
       filesystem from nowon and treat what you find there as distinct
       file"space"
      ---------------------------------------------------------------



>Hi, Reinald
>
>I don't think this is a server problem, and I don't think it's specific
>to DEC-Unix.  I operate in a SUN-Solaris environment.
>
>(1)     I think this is the desired behavior.  You don't want to backup
>        NFS server files through the NFS client.  Therefore, when the
>        ADSM client executes an INCREMENTAL, it should not follow links
>        onto remote systems.  The NFS server should have its own backup
>        schedule with the ADSM server.
>
>(2)     I am not surprised by the archive behavior either.  ARCHIVE uses
>        the apparent name, and follows links to the bitter end.  However,
>        I cannot offer any further comment without knowing what you are
>        trying to accomplish with the ARCHIVE command.  I prefer to think
>        of ARCHIVE as a tool for specific files, and BACKUP (e.g. INCREMENTAL)
>        as the tool for filesystems.
>
>(3)     I do not use VIRTUALMOUNTPOINT.  I observe that filespaces are
>        assigned to mountpoints as defined by the OS.
>
>Rich
>
>At 02:30 PM 7/1/99 +0200, you wrote:
>>I think about downgrading  to Level 0.1 (IP21174.tar).
>>Could someone make this old version available ?  Thanks.
>>
>>We encounter the following problems, especially with newer levels:
>>
>>(1) None of the 3.1 Clients
>>    that distinguish between "Local" and "Network Filespace"
>>    works in Digital-Unix automounter-enviroment.
>>
>>    We tried
>>        Version 3 Release 1, Level 0.3
>>        Version 3 Release 1, Level 0.5
>>        Version 3 Release 1, Level 0.6
>>        Version 3 Release 1, Level 0.7 on Digital-Unix 4.0d
>>   (Server is Version 3, Release 1, Level 2.20 on AIX-RS/6000)
>>
>>   In all cases "Network Filespace" shows only the physical mountpoints
>>   and does not follow the symlink of the logical paths
>>
>>        (example:
>>                elgon:/dist1/admin
>>        is asignd to the logical path
>>                /DIST/admin
>>        the automounter-daemon on another node mounts this filesystem
>>        dynamicaly to the physical mountpoint
>>                /a/elgon/dist1/admin
>>        and establisches a symbolic link
>>                /DIST/admin/ -> /a/elgon/dist1/admin
>>        -> adsm -clients is only able to follow the physical mountpoint,
>>           which chandes if the disk migrates to another nfs-server)
>>
>>(2) trying do do an archive on "Local Filsspace"
>>        /dist1/admin
>>                (with   /dev/rz0a            /
>>                (with   /dev/rz0a            /
>>                        /dev/rz0g            /usr
>>                        /dev/rz5h            /dist1 )
>>
>>
>>   results not only in recursing subdirectories but to search the tree
>>   in *both* directions. It does not even stay in the "Local Filespace"
>>   but tends to cover the whole nfs-cluster, like
>>        /dist1/admin/.../usr/local/CASE/xyz
>>                (with /usr/local -> /DIST/alpha and
>>                      /DIST/alpha/bin/CASE -> /DIST/CASE,
>>                      no upward symlink across startingpoint )
>>
>>(3) I did not have much luck with the use of "virtualmountpoint" yet
>>    on DEC-Unix.
>>    (3.1) If I use in now in 3.1.05
>>                virtualmountpoint       /
>>                virtualmountpoint       /usr
>>          dsm->Archive shows 2 identical / and
>>          2 identical  /usr -entries. So what?
>>    (3.2) do I have to use "virtualmountpoint" at all if I do a
>>                dsmc /DIST/alpha   followd by
>>                dsmc /DIST/share
>>          to make shure that both are kept sepearate?
>>
>>          Are "Filespaces" asigned to the first section of the path
>>          by default rather than to the filesystem as defined by the
>>          operating system ? Is there a way to correct this ?
>>
>>
>>   the desired behavior of the client is trivial:
>>      ---------------------------------------------------------------
>>       follow the path given by the argument of dsmc, don't leave the
>>       filesystem from nowon and treat what you find there as distinct
>>       file"space"
>>      ---------------------------------------------------------------
>>   ...
>>
>>
>>
>>Do you have any hints or comments ?
>>Do you have similar experiences with the DEC-Clients ?
>>Are the points mentioned above known to ibm or are they really unique ?
>>
>>Thanks for your reply in every case
>>
>>   Reinald Gfuellner
>>
>>--
>>--.---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> 3~  Reinald  Gfuellner                            PGP: use finger  ..|.
>>     Lehrstuhl fuer Prozessrechner, TU Muenchen, phone: +49-89-289-23564
>>----------gfullner AT lpr.ei.tum DOT 
>>de-------------------fax:+49-89-289-23555-
>>
>>



>Richard C. Dempsey                 email: dempsey AT kodak DOT com
>Public Online Services             pager: 716-975-3539
>11th Floor, Bldg 83, RL            phone: 716-477-3457
>Eastman Kodak Company              fax:   716-722-3885
>Rochester, NY 14650-2203


--
--.---------------------------------------------------------------------
--.---------------------------------------------------------------------
 3~  Reinald  Gfuellner                            PGP: use finger  ..|.
 3~  Reinald  Gfuellner                            PGP: use finger  ..|.
     Lehrstuhl fuer Prozessrechner, TU Muenchen, phone: +49-89-289-23564
----------gfullner AT lpr.ei.tum DOT de-------------------fax:
+49-89-289-23555-
+49-89-289-23555-
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • Re (2): DEC-Unix 3.1 Client <-> automounter, ufs, nfs, Reinald Gf|llner <=