ADSM-L

Re: Scratch status in 3494

1999-06-17 16:55:00
Subject: Re: Scratch status in 3494
From: Ernie Lim <fm AT ERN-E DOT ORG>
Date: Thu, 17 Jun 1999 13:55:00 -0700
Yes.. this should do it if i understand the question properly.
Also, make sure that none of the drives have tapes in them when you issue this
command.
--
Ernie Lim
Ernie Lim
407ETR AIX Support -- www.407etr.com
Toronto, Ontario Canada
email: elim AT ern-e DOT org


Dwight Cook wrote:

>      AUDIT LIBRARY youradsmlibr
>
> ______________________________ Reply Separator 
> _________________________________
> Subject: Scratch status in 3494
> Author:  Edouard.Lauer (Edouard.Lauer AT BIL-DEXIA DOT COM) at unix,mime
> Date:    6/17/99 3:05 AM
>
> Hello,
>
> due to a problem saturday in the 3494 library on the robot himself
> have become the status FF00 (insert mode). The ADSM server himself
> normally has tapes defined as private (category 012c in the 3494
> library) and scratch (category 012e in 3494 library).
> Now there's a discordancy between the ADSM server where some
> tapes are in status scratch or private and the library himself. We've
> tried to update the 3494 library with the command:
>
>         update libv lib_3590 <volname> status=scratch or
>         update libv lib_3590 <volname> status=private
>
> but nothing works. Does someone know in which manner we can tell the
> 3494 library to reflect to status of tapes on the ADSM server?
>
> Help is greatly appreciated,
> _________________ Lauer Edouard ____________________
> ______ Prod. informatique ____ Systèmes Ouverts ________
> __ * +352 4590 3889 __ * Edouard.Lauer AT bil-dexia DOT com __
>
>
>
> _ * +352 4590 3889 __ * Edouard.Lauer AT bil-dexia DOT com ___erver
> An electronic message is not binding on its sender.
> Any message referring to a binding engagement must be confirmed in writing 
> and d
> uly signed.
>
>
> ny message referring to a binding engagement must be confirm
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>