ADSM-L

Re: NetWare performance w 3.1.0.7 client and older server

1999-06-15 08:58:21
Subject: Re: NetWare performance w 3.1.0.7 client and older server
From: "Lambelet,Rene,VEVEY,FC-SIL/INF." <Rene.Lambelet AT NESTLE DOT COM>
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 1999 14:58:21 +0200
Thanks a lot Paul, the MEMORYEFFICIENTBACKUP NO fixed the performance
problem we had with 3.1.0.7.

Regards,

Rene Lambelet
Nestec SA - 55, Av. Nestle - CH-1800 Vevey
Tel: ++41'21'924'35'43 / Fax: ++41'21'924'45'89
E-Mail: rene.lambelet AT nestle DOT com



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Paul Zarnowski [SMTP:vkm AT CORNELLC.CIT.CORNELL DOT EDU]
> Sent: Monday, June 14, 1999 7:07 PM
> To:   ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
> Subject:      Re: NetWare performance w 3.1.0.7 client and older server
>
> Last week I posted a question about ADSM performance on the new 3.1.0.7
> client.  Here is an update on what we have found.  After adjusting some
> tuning options, we were able to get performance back to what it was
> before.
>  The parameters that we adjusted were:
>
> largecommbuffers yes
> memoryefficientbackup no
>
> I believe the culprit was memoryefficientbackup.  Somewhere along the
> line,
> the default for this option was changed from "no" to "yes" for some
> reason.
>  I did not see any mention of this change in the README file for the
> 3.1.0.7 client, but the latest version of the User's Guide does indeed
> have
> a different default documented for this option.
>
> ..Paul
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>