ADSM-L

Re: ADSM-server on a single box

1999-06-14 17:51:34
Subject: Re: ADSM-server on a single box
From: Rodrigo Cordovil Gazzaneo <rgazzaneo AT INFOLINK.COM DOT BR>
Date: Mon, 14 Jun 1999 16:51:34 EST
Is your actual server a SMP 332 MHz or uniprocessor wide node ? (I'll
consider it is the uniprocessor node because I'm not too sure about the
minimum AIX level for the SMP Node).

SP transfer speed is a good point if you have a switched frame.

I don't know what brought Henk to this decision, but if the problem is
scalability, there are some SP newer nodes with bigger throughput, like a
the S70/A external node or internal SMP Wide nodes. And a new PCI High Node
is to be announced.

The F50 has the same architecture than the SMP 332 MHz Wide Node, so it is
almost 100% correct to say that it can handle whatever the F50 can handle (
very few exceptions).

However, if you have to move the server out of the SP, take I/O capacity
into bigger consideration. The H70 has a more powerful I/O architecture.

best regards,
Rodrigo Gazzaneo

>Questions:
>Are all nodes your backing up in the SP where ADSM server resides ? If so,
>why move to a node outside the SP, you will lose the SP transfer speed.
>Will the F-50 handle 6 SCSI adapters like the High node can ?
>Dave Bronson
>Unix Admin.
>Compass Group, USA
>704-329-7944
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Henk ten Have [mailto:hthta AT SARA DOT NL]
>Sent: Monday, June 14, 1999 2:59 PM
>To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
>Subject: ADSM-server on a single box
>I'am planning to move our ADSM-server from our SP to a
>single box.
>ADSM config this moment:
>- server on a SP wide node (512Mb mem, AIX 4.2.1.0);
>- attached is a 3494 with 6 3590 drives (SCSI);
>- daily backup's/HSM between 80 and 100Gb with peaks up to
>160Gb;
>- (mirrored) adsm-database (10Gb);
>- disk-pool 4Gb (only used by remote machine's with slow
>network connection's);
>- > 120 scheduled nodes (excluding PC's);
>- backup/HSM data 15Tb.
>I'am thinking about a F50 with AIX, with at least 2
>processor's, 1Gb memory,
>a lot of diskspace (100Gb?) and ESCON-interfaces to the 3590
>drives
>(which actually will be upgraded to 3590E in about a month).
>Does anyone have experience with these kind of
>configurations or does anyone
>have a better solution or a better idea?
>Any hints and tips will be appreciated.
>Cheers,
>Henk ten Have
>Academic Computing Services Amsterdam
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>