ADSM-L

Re: DRM Losing Tapes

1999-05-28 09:49:05
Subject: Re: DRM Losing Tapes
From: Salvatore Greco <sgreco AT TRUWORTHS.CO DOT ZA>
Date: Fri, 28 May 1999 15:49:05 +0200
Hi

We are also part of the "missing tapes" group.  We upgraded our server to
the latest version to get around the expiration problem, and still about 2
to 5 tapes go offsite every day and maybe one or two come back.

We recently did an audit and found that 98 tapes were at the "vault" and not
known to ADSM.  This is not the first time that this has happened, and it
first occured around November last year.

The consultant is busy preparing a report and we may be able to share it
with this forum to try and solve the problem.  I'd like to see some comments
from any of the IBM developers that read this list :)


|-----Original Message-----
|From: Beardsley, David [mailto:david.beardsley AT SPCORP DOT COM]
|Sent: Friday, May 28, 1999 3:10 PM
|To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
|Subject: Re: DRM Losing Tapes
|
|
|I to have noticed this problem with the DB tapes. I have
|noticed that most
|of the time ours do not ever enter the Vault Retrieve status.
|Example we
|changed the retention of our DB Backups from 14 to 7 days. The 7 extra
|db-tapes never went to vault retrieve.

--
******************************************************************************
******************************************************************************
The use of the Truworths e-mail facility is not permitted for the distribution
of chain letters or offensive email of any nature whatsoever.  Truworths
hereby distances itself from and accepts no liability in respect of the
unauthorised use of its e-mail facility or the sending of e-mail
communications for other than strictly business purposes.  Truworths
furthermore disclaims liability for any unauthorised instruction for which
permission was not granted.
Any recipient of an unacceptable communication, a chain letter or offensive
material of any nature is requested to report it to abuse AT truworths.co DOT za
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>