This are my cents, but I'm not familiar with OS/2 and ADSM V2:
As far as I understood PC-like filesystems, chkdsk checks inconsistencies in
FAT .
This definitvely will not help You.
If You had a V3 Server and You are using ADSM in rollfwd mode, You could have
done
a point-in-time restore of the db. But You have V2, and I'm not too familiar
with
that..
You could try an 'audit db', but You will need plenty of time (hours, I would
expect). Better You call IBM with prio 1, if You have a service contract.
If not
1) try to restore the db?
2) export all your nodes as far as it is possible, scratch your db and import
all
Maybe others have better ideas.
If You pass this problems, You should go for ADSM V3 asap.
Regards
Roger
--
Roger Hohmann
Roger Hohmann
WestLB
Division: 009 Services
Abteilung 001-80622
Herzogstra_e 15
D - 40217 D|sseldorf
Tel.: +49 211 826 8155
Fax : +49 211 826 5393
mailto: Roger_Hohmann AT westlb DOT de
Tahir Mahmood schrieb:
> Hi,
>
> (This is a repost as I did not get a reply to my previous posting)
>
> Our setup is : ADSM Server V2R1 for OS/2 (0.15/0.15) Service level.
>
> I found out that while doing db backup there is a certain page on one of my DB
> vols on the server HDD which cannot be
> read. Pls see copy of activity log below :
>
> ANR4554I Backed up 1232096 of 1404855 database pages.
> ANR4554I Backed up 1254560 of 1404855 database pages.
> ANR0246E Error reading logical page 1257648 (physical page 226736) from
> database volume G:\DBVOLS\DB_VOL08.DSM.
> ANR9999D iccopy.c(1552): Unable to read from db volume.
> ANR9999D icback.c(328): Backup rc=6.
> ANR4581W Database backup/restore terminated - internal server error detected.
> ANR1361I Output volume DSM203 closed.
>
> On checking ANR0246E it recommends that the server be 'halted' and vol be
> repaired. I tried doing that using CHKDSK /F on
> the offending vol and ran a db backup again but it does not seem to have
> repaired the logical error. Is there some other
> way to repair it ?
>
> Any help would be highly appreicated.
>
> A direct e-mail response, if possible, would be help me out much faster.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Tahir
|
