ADSM-L

Re: Problem with volume history after volumes expire

1999-04-15 11:29:46
Subject: Re: Problem with volume history after volumes expire
From: John Schneider <jdschn AT IBM DOT NET>
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 1999 10:29:46 -0500
Sorry, I forgot to mention, we are running ADSM server code 3.1.2.0, on
a Solaris 2.6 server, in case that matters.

John Schneider

John Schneider wrote:

> Greetings,
>     We have a problem where certain DLT tapes seem to be scratch tapes,
> but they still have
> volume history associated with them.  In other words, when you do a 'q
> volume ....' against
> them they say there is no such volume.  But if you do a 'q volhist' you
> see that the tape has
> a volume history of STGNEW, and date a few months old.
>     How are tapes getting in to this state?  We have some Onbar Informix
> backups that we
> manually delete the data off of after a certain number of weeks.  After
> this happens they
> go into a volume history state of STGDELETE.  We have an administrative
> schedule that
> deletes the volume history for any tapes in the STGDELETE state, because
> otherwise we
> couldn't reuse them as scratches, even though they were empty.  But I
> don't think these
> tapes are our problem, since they are in the STGDELETE state.
>     We also have an administrative schedule that deletes old ADSM
> database backups
> using a 'delete volhist ...' command, and that seems to work.
>     Tapes that are reclaimed or expired by the normal processes seem to
> get deleted and
> can be reused without a problem.
>
>     So... where are these tapes coming from that are still in the volume
> history with STGNEW,
> but aren't in any storage pool?
>     When we try to do a 'label libvolume ...' against them, it bails out
> with a ANR8816E error,
> which says the tape can't be labelled because there is volume history.
> (The reason we do a
> 'label libvolume', by the way, instead of just a 'checkin libvol' is
> because we don't want our
> operators to have to make a distinction between scratch tapes and new
> tapes.)
>     Any advice would be appreciated.  I don't understand how we are
> creating this situation.
>
> John Schneider
>
> ***********************************************************************
> * John D. Schneider       Email: jdschn AT ibm DOT net * Phone: 314-349-4556
> * Lowery Systems, Inc.
> * 1329 Horan                  Disclaimer: Opinions expressed here are
> * Fenton, MO 63026                   mine and mine alone.
> ***********************************************************************
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>