ADSM-L

Re: Re (Rescued Mail)

1999-03-19 15:27:57
Subject: Re: Re (Rescued Mail)
From: Thomas R Rhodes <TRR AT INEL DOT GOV>
Date: Fri, 19 Mar 1999 13:27:57 -0700
We are running ADSM on a OS390R5 system and the only problem I seen coming
from OS390R3 was thar the scheduler did not seem to schedule nodes as
fast..




Harry Cantrell <Harry.Cantrell AT KMC-USA DOT COM> on 03/12/99 03:22:27 PM

Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU>


To:   ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
cc:    (bcc: Thomas R Rhodes/TRR/LMITCO/INEEL/US)


Subject:  Re (Rescued Mail)




---------------------- Forwarded by Harry Cantrell/Kmc-Usa on 03/12/99
02:18 PM ---------------------------   Mike Soursby 03/11/99 11:37 AM  To:
02:18 PM ---------------------------   Mike Soursby 03/11/99 11:37 AM  To:
ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU cc:   Harry Cantrell/Kmc-Usa  Subject:  Re: ADSM
3.1.2.0 & OS390 r5  (Document link not converted)  We're just now getting
into it, but we're on OS/390 2.6, and haven't had any problems SO FAR.
Could it be your ICS/IPS setting on MVS?  Are you using workload manager?
Could it be a TCP/IP setting problem?  Those are some places to start.
Sorry if this isn't enough help.    Harry Cantrell 03/11/99 10:46 AM  To:
Mike Soursby/Kmc-Usa cc: Subject:  ADSM 3.1.2.0 & OS390 r5  FYI
---------------------- Forwarded by Harry Cantrell/Kmc-Usa on 03/11/99
10:42 AM ---------------------------   David Ehresman
10:42 AM ---------------------------   David Ehresman
<deehre01 AT ULKYVM.LOUISVILLE DOT EDU> on 03/06/99 10:58:58 AM  Please respond 
to
"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU>  To:
ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU cc:    (bcc: Harry Cantrell/Kmc-Usa)  Subject:  ADSM
3.1.2.0 & OS!
390 r5     We are running an ADSM 3.1.2.0 server on OS390. We have been
successfully running on OS390 R3 and have been testing on OS390 R5. The
testing went ok but when we moved OS390 R5 into production last night, ADSM
has been having problems.  ADSM has been running at about 75% of a
processor and responds very sluggishly or not at all to commands entered
from the OS390 console. It does not appear to be doing any productive
works.  I don't know if it is related, but we also got a number of ANR2579E
messages shortly after startup indicating schedules failing with return
code 1.  Is anyone running ADSM on OS390 R5? At what ADSM maintenance
level? Any ideas?  David
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>