ADSM-L

Re: Backup Throughput

1999-03-12 08:57:27
Subject: Re: Backup Throughput
From: "Armstrong, Stanley" <SArmst01 AT HARRIS DOT COM>
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 1999 08:57:27 -0500
Depending on the size of your disk storage pool.... the speed of the tape
subsystem throughput may be irrelevant in ADSM. The data could go directly
to disk.
We have SSA disk on a AIX Sp2.

With AIX as a server, I find the network interface is the critical factor.
(from coaxial Ethernet connecting a desktop on a busy network to SP2 high
speed switch or shared memory)
The difference of the interface speed in our shop is in the range of 1000
times or more.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Loon, E.J. van - SPLXM [SMTP:Eric-van.Loon AT KLM DOT NL]
> Sent: Friday, March 12, 1999 5:28 AM
> To:   ADSM-L AT vm.marist DOT edu
> Subject:      Re: Backup Throughput
>
> Hi RH (strange name...)!
> The native throughput for 3570 is 8 Mbytes/s. I have seen 7 Mbytes/s.
> native
> with large database files. Client and server were both AIX.
> Kindest regards,
> Eric van Loon
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: rh [mailto:rh_info_store AT YAHOO DOT COM]
> Sent: Thursday, March 11, 1999 17:41
> To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
> Subject: Backup Throughput
>
>
> Sorry if this has been asked before.
>
> What is the "typical" MB/hr backup rates that can be achieved by an
> ADSM/Magstar type combination ? I realize that there are many factors
> to consider including server speed, network speed, etc. Does anyone
> have a connection/equipment combination that has an exceptionally high
> rate ? I have some very small windows available to backup some 600-1G
> of changed data each day.
> Many thanks,
> RH
>
>
>
>
>
> _________________________________________________________
> DO YOU YAHOO!?
> Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>