Re: LABEL LIBV versus DSMLABEL
1999-02-02 11:20:05
What 3.1 PTF level are you running? In our case, the LABEL LIBV function
did not work properly until we went to V3.1.2.0 (on the HP platform with a
STK 9710 library). Up until that point we had a number of problems that
appeared to be related to the software's ability to get a correct inventory
of what was in the access port.
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- LABEL LIBV versus DSMLABEL, Johan Pol
- Re: LABEL LIBV versus DSMLABEL, Kelly J. Lipp
- Re: LABEL LIBV versus DSMLABEL, Johan Pol
- Re: LABEL LIBV versus DSMLABEL, Kelly J. Lipp
- Re: LABEL LIBV versus DSMLABEL, Johan Pol
- Re: LABEL LIBV versus DSMLABEL, Leo Humar
- Re: LABEL LIBV versus DSMLABEL, Kirsten Gloeer
- Re: LABEL LIBV versus DSMLABEL,
Survoy, Bernard J <=
- Re: LABEL LIBV versus DSMLABEL, Kelly J. Lipp
- Re: LABEL LIBV versus DSMLABEL, Kirsten Gloeer
- Re: LABEL LIBV versus DSMLABEL, Kirsten Gloeer
- Re: LABEL LIBV versus DSMLABEL, Kelly J. Lipp
- Re: LABEL LIBV versus DSMLABEL, Kirsten Gloeer
- LABEL LIBV versus DSMLABEL, Johan Pol
- Re: LABEL LIBV versus DSMLABEL, Johan Pol
- Re: LABEL LIBV versus DSMLABEL, Kirsten Gloeer [mailto:Kirsten.Gloeer
- Re: LABEL LIBV versus DSMLABEL, Kirsten Gloeer
- Re: LABEL LIBV versus DSMLABEL, Kirsten Gloeer
|
|
|