Re: Upgrade to 3.1.2.0

> To All of those who responded to this email indicating that the upgradebd
> parameter WAS required, could you write back exactly what your ADSM code
> levels were BEFORE your upgrade to 3.1.2.0.

I went from 3.1.1.3 to 3.1.2.0 on Sun Solaris.

Steve (unVMix Systems Programmer/Dude) Roder
(tkssteve AT ubvm.cc.buffalo DOT edu | tkssteve AT acsu.buffalo DOT edu | 
(716)645-3564 ,
   | http://ubvm.cc.buffalo.edu/~tkssteve)

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Upgrade to 3.1.2.0, Julie Phinney Re: Upgrade to 3.1.2.0, Steven P Roder Upgrade to 3.1.2.0, John W. Stephens Re: Upgrade to 3.1.2.0, Buechler, Becky Re: Upgrade to 3.1.2.0, Jennifer Davis Re: Upgrade to 3.1.2.0, Buechler, Becky Re: Upgrade to 3.1.2.0, Andrew Raibeck Re: Upgrade to 3.1.2.0, Dirk Kastens Re: Upgrade to 3.1.2.0, Roger Hohmann Re: Upgrade to 3.1.2.0, Steven P Roder <= Re: Upgrade to 3.1.2.0, Tom Tann{s Re: Upgrade to 3.1.2.0, Dirk Kastens Re: Upgrade to 3.1.2.0, Tom Tann{s Re: Upgrade to 3.1.2.0, John W. Stephens Upgrade to 3.1.2.0, Tom Brooks Re: Upgrade to 3.1.2.0, Jennifer Davis Re: Upgrade to 3.1.2.0, Sheelagh Treweek Re: Upgrade to 3.1.2.0, Jennifer Davis [SMTP:jedavis

Previous by Date:	Re: Upgrade to 3.1.2.0, Roger Hohmann
Next by Date:	Re: webshell for win95, Andrew Raibeck
Previous by Thread:	Re: Upgrade to 3.1.2.0, Roger Hohmann
Next by Thread:	Re: Upgrade to 3.1.2.0, Tom Tann{s
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]