Re: backups to disk
1998-07-10 08:48:50
We have a smallish disk storage pool to improve concurrency in backups.
We also have a much larger one that's dedicated to SQL-Backtrack. I
found that the SQL-Backtrack jobs held the tape drives way too long and
caused problems. Sometimes the session would show that it was waiting
to receive data for 20 minutes or more at a time. Meanwhile, it had the
the tape drive locked so no other backups or processes could run.
Tina
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ann Courchaine [SMTP:acourcha AT CSC DOT COM]
> Sent: Friday, July 10, 1998 7:19 AM
> To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
> Subject: backups to disk
>
> What is the general consensus on using a disk storage pool that then
> migrates to
> tape? Do sites actually use these or does everyone write directly to
> tape?
> Ann Courchaine
> Year 2000 National Practice
> Consulting & Systems Integration
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- backups to disk, Ann Courchaine
- Re: backups to disk, David Beardsley
- Re: backups to disk, Moir,Betsy
- Re: backups to disk,
Hilton Tina <=
- Re: backups to disk, Richard Sims
- Re: backups to disk, Weeks, Debbie
- Re: backups to disk, Jackie Balboni
- Re: backups to disk, Roger Nadler
- Re: backups to disk, Julie Phinney
- Re: backups to disk, Cunningham, Jennifer
- Re: backups to disk, Prather, Wanda
- Re: backups to disk, Lothar Guthmann
|
|
|