ADSM-L

Re: ADSM vs Legato vs SCH

1998-06-04 10:27:43
Subject: Re: ADSM vs Legato vs SCH
From: "Hipolito Fierro, Jr" <polo AT NMCOURTS DOT COM>
Date: Thu, 4 Jun 1998 08:27:43 -0600
How big is big? We have a ~9GB database in Informix.


Stidd, Sharon wrote:

> In this same realm, my company is looking at using SCH software instead
> of ADSM.
> The main reason is ADSM's inability to backup our large Informix
> database which resides on an SGI platform via an API.  Any thoughts or
> comments on SCH?
>
> Thanks all!
>
> Sharon Stidd
>
> Client/Server Administrator
> Alliance Data Systems
> 800 Tech Center Drive
> Gahanna OH 43230
> 614/729-4340
> Fax 614/729-4499
>
> > ----------
> > From:         Julie Phinney[SMTP:jphinney AT HUMANA DOT COM]
> > Sent:         Wednesday, June 03, 1998 10:25 AM
> > To:   ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
> > Subject:      ADSM vs Legato
> >
> > Legato is being considered at my company because (and this is just my
> > understanding, could be wrong)  Legato allows you to direct-connect
> > backup
> > clients to mainframe attached STK silos.  Even when the mainframe is
> > down.
> > You'd need an AIX box or something for the Legato indexes to reside
> > on.
> > With ADSM there is no direct-connecting to those silos.
> > Can anyone verify this?  Can ADSM clients backup direct to the silos
> > without running through the AIX box?
> > Julie
> >
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>