Re: <no subject> (ANS4017E (RC-50))
1998-04-24 09:06:20
Subject: |
Re: <no subject> (ANS4017E (RC-50)) |
From: |
"Smith, Richard" <smithrr AT MARITZ DOT COM> |
Date: |
Fri, 24 Apr 1998 08:06:20 -0500 |
Bob,
What sort of problems are you having with Backtrack and your
UNIX boxes?? Our UNIX guys also use Backtrack and are having problems.
Rick Smith
Maritz, Inc.
Storage & Security Administration
smithrr AT maritz DOT com
(314) 827-1584
> ----------
> From: Bob Murphy[SMTP:Bob.Murphy AT CLOROX DOT COM]
> Sent: Thursday, April 23, 1998 5:29 PM
> To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
> Subject: Re: <no subject> (ANS4017E (RC-50))
>
> Subject would be nice on your next message...
>
> Could be that the ADSM Server (Target) wasn't up. We got rafts of
> these on
> an NT system on a scheduled backup when the ADSM Server was kaput.
>
> Query - What special benefit are you getting out of running SQL
> Backtrack
> on your SQL (Server?) 6.5/SP3 ?? Assume this is NT and MS SQL Server?
>
> We're running ADSM Connect Agent for Microsoft SQL Server (v1.1) thru
> the
> SQL Enterprise Manager Scheduled Tasks. Works fine (except when the
> ADSM
> Server is down...). We're running Backtrack on Unix boxes (yeah, I
> know,
> comparing apples to oranges) and having many problems.
>
> -bob
> bob.murphy AT clorox DOT com
>
>
> ______________________________ Reply Separator
> _________________________________
> Subject: <no subject>
> Author: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU> at Internet
> Date: 4/23/98 11:57 AM
>
>
> Hello all, we are running SQL 6.5 SP#3 and using Sql Backtrack
> along
> with ADSM v2.1 and are receiving the following error messages
> which
> seem to be quite generic.
>
> DT-01333W: TIMEOUT - Transaction timed out
> DT-05412W: Skipping backup of /opt/datatools/backups/ddm1.
>
>
> [obsi/adsm 3318] obsi/adsm: ADSM: dsmInit failed:
> ANS4017E (RC-50) Session rejected: TCP/IP connection failure
> [obsi/adsm 3318] obsi/adsm: ADSM: dsmInit failed, return code:
> ANS4017E (RC-50) Session rejected: TCP/IP connection failure
>
> Have any of you seen this before and if so, what was causing it.
> Thanks in advance just for reading this...
>
> Rob S.
>
|
|
|