ADSM-L

Re: partitioning robot

1998-04-20 11:24:55
Subject: Re: partitioning robot
From: Paul Zarnowski <vkm AT CORNELLC.CIT.CORNELL DOT EDU>
Date: Mon, 20 Apr 1998 11:24:55 -0400
Lindsay,

Thanks for the suggestion.  But, I didn't think that ADSM was able to share
one device (i.e., /dev/lb1) between two library definitions.  Is this
supported?  If it is, that should solve my problem.

..Paul

At 09:15 AM 4/20/98 -0400, Linsay Morris wrote:
>Define two different ADSM libraries using the same /dev/whatever.
>Define drive1,2 on one library, drive3,4 on the other.
>Checkin one set of tapes to one library, the other set oftapes to the other.
>
>Yes?
>
>
>ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU on 04/18/98 07:57:15 PM
>Please respond to ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
>To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
>cc:
>Subject: partitioning robot
>
>
>Can anyone think of a way to partition a 4-drive DLT tape robot so that one
>set of tapes always gets loaded on 2 specific drives (e.g., DRIVE1 and
>DRIVE2), but a different set of tapes always gets loaded in the other 2
>drives (e.g., DRIVE3 and DRIVE4)?  One set of tapes would be newly added.
>The other set are pre-existing tapes containing user data.
>
>The robot is a Breece Hill Q47, the drives are DLT 4000s.
>
>Thanks for any ideas.
>..Paul
>

--
Paul Zarnowski                         Ph: 607-255-4757
Paul Zarnowski                         Ph: 607-255-4757
747 Rhodes Hall, Cornell University    Fx: 607-254-8888
Ithaca, NY 14853-2602                  Em: psz1 AT cornell DOT edu
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>