Re: Wrong time-stamps in the activity log
1998-04-14 12:02:12
Subject: |
Re: Wrong time-stamps in the activity log |
From: |
Andreas Peikert <apeikert AT AMADEUS DOT NET> |
Date: |
Tue, 14 Apr 1998 17:02:12 +0100 |
Well, nobody's perfect: I must admit that I answered too quick in my first
reply:
> 1998.04.09 15:27:14 ANR0800I
> DELETE FILESPACE: /886084568 for node
> HD004 started as process 248.
> 1998.04.09 16:27:14 ANR0802I
> Delete Filespace /886084568 (backup/
> archive data) for node HD004 started.
> 1998.04.09 16:29:09 ANR0806I
> Delete Filespace /886084568 complete
> for node HD004: 5246 files deleted.
>
> The correct time for the message-id ANR0800I must be 16:27:14
I assumed that all ADSM msgs come asynchronously and from processes
which ADSM schedules internally. In addition, I had no performance
figures from the machine on which ADSM runs here. ANR0802I should
occur also roughly at the same time as ANR0800I.
> 1998.04.09 18:15:53 ANR0802I
> Delete Filespace /892031471 (backup/
> archive data) for node HD004 started.
> 1998.04.09 20:15:53 ANR0800I DELETE FILESPACE: /892031471 for node
> HD004 started as process 250.
> 1998.04.09 20:17:39 ANR0806I Delete Filespace /892031471 complete
> for node HD004: 4757 files deleted.
>
> The correct time for the message-id ANR0802I must be 20:15:53
Well, here I read too quick. ANR0800I should not occur 2 hours later
and ...
the question from Mr. Flemming stays unanswered.
Concerning this question, I just remember some very nasty side
effects on WinNT 4.0 with different service packs and Lotus Notes
4.0/4.5. Lotus Notes switched the time stamps of notes documents
around after switching daylight savings time but I don't remember
the exact scenario.
Maybe AIX plays a role here as well - or was the problem just
observed with exactly and only this release of ADSM?
Best regards
Andreas Peikert, Systems Programmer
Fon: +49 (0)8122 43-5805 / Fax: +49 (0)8122 43-3260
aMaDEUS Data Processing GmbH, P.O. Box, D-85424 Erding, Germany
|
|
|