ADSM-L

[no subject]

1998-04-08 10:28:38
From: Doug Thorneycroft <dthorneycroft AT LACSD DOT ORG>
Date: Wed, 8 Apr 1998 07:28:38 -0700
Yes, I've noticed this on our NT server.

Matthew Warren wrote:
>
> Hello All,
>
>         Just a quick point,
>
>         If a schedule takes longer than its duration to complete, bit
> still completes fine, am I right in that  the scheduler still shows the
> status as missed?
>
> Matthew Warren.
> HOIST - Head Office Infrastructure Support Team.
> ADSM (FAB) + Unix support.
>         Marks & Spencer Plc.
>         Baker Street.
>         London.
> Email: matthew.warren AT marks-and-spencer DOT com
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • [no subject], Doug Thorneycroft <=