Re: The "incremental forever" paradigm,Was: How would you do =
2015-10-04 18:00:05
At 11:05 AM 03/06/98 -0600, John Schneider wrote:
> It just seems too optimistic to presume that one copy of all =
your
> critical files would be enough, no matter what.
You actually have *TWO* copies of your files. The one on the client's
disk and the one that serves as a backup. And counting an offsite copy,
that's *THREE*. Periodic full backups buy you absolutely nothing, unless
you do not use colocation.
We've been running backups for years and have never had a single case of
a failed recovery due to a bad backup tape. (Anyone else?)
My theory is that it's far less likely that you will lose all *THREE* =
copies
of your files than it is that some disaster will wipe out your entire =
site.
And in that case, one could make the argument that the people who want =
to
recover the data and the systems to which they would recover it would
probably also be history...
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread> |
- Re: The "incremental forever" paradigm,Was: How would you do =,
Michael R Vogt <=
|
|
|