DSanders AT INTERNAL.MASSMUTUAL DOT COM on 02/11/98 08:43:43 AM
Please respond to ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
To:   ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
cc:    (bcc: Julie Phinney/Green Bay/Humana)
Subject:  Re: ADSM alternatives



Can I ask why (in general terms)??
Also, I wanted to note that there wasn't a great response to my question
about other ADSM replacement product analysis.  Does this mean:
*there aren't a lot of MVS server customers here on this forum?
*that people jumped on ADSM initially and for various reasons, don't
want to convert to another product?
*that people want to keep quiet about the analysis they may have done?
*that no other product does the job of ADSM?
I appreciate the responses that I DID get and would appreciate all other
comments?????
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Smith, Richard [SMTP:smithrr AT MARITZ DOT COM]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 1998 9:03 AM
> To:   ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
> Subject:      Re: ADSM alternatives
>
>         Just a note... We are using Harbor for one of our NT servers
> and
> about
> 10 Novell servers, and plan to replace it with ADSM.
>
> Rick Smith
> Maritz, Inc.
> Storage & Security Administration
> smithrr AT maritz DOT com
> (314) 827-1584
>
> > ----------
> > From:         Hauenstein Peter[SMTP:Peter.Hauenstein AT AID.ZH DOT CH]
> > Sent:         Wednesday, February 11, 1998 3:17 AM
> > To:   ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
> > Subject:      Re: ADSM alternatives
> >
> > If you are looking for another solution, have a look at Harbor from
> > Interlink.
> > web: http:/www.interlink.com
> >
> > Peter
> >