ADSM-L

Re: Restore Volume vs Restore Storage Pool

1998-01-31 12:34:51
Subject: Re: Restore Volume vs Restore Storage Pool
From: David Cannon <cannon AT US.IBM DOT COM>
Date: Sat, 31 Jan 1998 12:34:51 -0500
> I have a destroyed tape in my primary tape pool for which I have a
> backup pool.  I want to recover the data from teh destroyed tape.
> Looking at both the Restore Volume command and the Restore Storage
> Pool command, I can't tell which one I should use.  They both would seem
> to offer the same results.  The only difference I can see is that I would
> first need to mark the destroyed volume as Destroyed before doing the
> Restore Storage Pool command.

The Restore Stgpool and Restore Volume commands are very closely related.
Under the covers, most of the code is the same.  The major differences are

o Restore Stgpool restores primary files that have previously been marked as
damaged because of a detected data-integrity error.  This is done regardless of
whether the volume has been designated as destroyed.

o Restore Volume allows you to specify the volume name(s) rather than using
Update Volume to designate the destroyed volume(s).

For restoring a small number of volumes, the Restore Volume is more convenient,
particularly if you are not interested in restoring damaged files on other
volumes.  For restoring damaged files or a large number of destroyed volumes,
Restore Stgpool is preferable.

Dave Cannon
ADSM Server Development
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>