Oh yes, I would love it...
Rene Lambelet, Nestle, VEVEY

>-----Original Message-----
>From:  David G. Kalenderian [SMTP:DAVEK AT MITVMA.MIT DOT EDU]
>Sent:  Wednesday, December 03, 1997 1:55 PM
>To:    ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
>Subject:       Re: ADSM requirements
>
>On Wed, 3 Dec 1997 06:38:05 -0500 Sanders, David said:
>>Jerry, this sounds like a good idea.  Knowledge = leverage!
>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Jerry Lawson [SMTP:jlawson AT THEHARTFORD DOT COM]
>>> Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 1997 7:31 PM
>>> To:   ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
>>> Subject:      Re: ADSM requirements
>>>
>>> ---------------------------- Forwarded with Changes
>>> ---------------------------
>>> From: INTERNET.OWNERAD at SNADGATE
>>> Date: 12/1/97 5:14PM
>>> To: Jerry Lawson at ASUPO
>>> *To: *ADSM-L at SNADGATE
>>> Subject: Re: ADSM requirements
>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> ---------
>>> Hey gang -
>>>
>>> Those who have been around the list for a while remember my gripe with
>>> requirements and submission of them - I won't repeat them here.
>>>
>>> But I did have an idea..... What if there was some way to track what
>>> requests
>>> had been submitted to IBM?  Dave Kalendarian has provided the number
>>> of the
>>> V3 for VM requirement.... What if we posted the information about a
>>> request
>>> to the list when we submitted one, so others would have a chance to
>>> say "Me
>>> too!"!  Or perhaps someone who can develop Internet web pages (I'm
>>> limited to
>>> Intranet) could build a page of the ones that had been supplied by
>>> other list
>>> members.....
>>>
>>> I keep thinking there has to be a better way here..... What do others
>>> think?
>>>
>>> Jerry Lawson
>>> jlawson AT thehartford DOT com
>
>Jerry,
>
>I think it's a good idea. We shouldn't limit ourselves to this one
>requirement.
>If others think it is worth while, I could create the Web page for ADSM
>requirements.
>
>Dave Kalenderian
>M.I.T.