ADSM-L

Re: ADSM requirements

1997-12-03 07:54:58
Subject: Re: ADSM requirements
From: "David G. Kalenderian" <DAVEK AT MITVMA.MIT DOT EDU>
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 1997 07:54:58 EST
On Wed, 3 Dec 1997 06:38:05 -0500 Sanders, David said:
>Jerry, this sounds like a good idea.  Knowledge = leverage!
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Jerry Lawson [SMTP:jlawson AT THEHARTFORD DOT COM]
>> Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 1997 7:31 PM
>> To:   ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
>> Subject:      Re: ADSM requirements
>>
>> ---------------------------- Forwarded with Changes
>> ---------------------------
>> From: INTERNET.OWNERAD at SNADGATE
>> Date: 12/1/97 5:14PM
>> To: Jerry Lawson at ASUPO
>> *To: *ADSM-L at SNADGATE
>> Subject: Re: ADSM requirements
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> ---------
>> Hey gang -
>>
>> Those who have been around the list for a while remember my gripe with
>> requirements and submission of them - I won't repeat them here.
>>
>> But I did have an idea..... What if there was some way to track what
>> requests
>> had been submitted to IBM?  Dave Kalendarian has provided the number
>> of the
>> V3 for VM requirement.... What if we posted the information about a
>> request
>> to the list when we submitted one, so others would have a chance to
>> say "Me
>> too!"!  Or perhaps someone who can develop Internet web pages (I'm
>> limited to
>> Intranet) could build a page of the ones that had been supplied by
>> other list
>> members.....
>>
>> I keep thinking there has to be a better way here..... What do others
>> think?
>>
>> Jerry Lawson
>> jlawson AT thehartford DOT com

Jerry,

I think it's a good idea. We shouldn't limit ourselves to this one requirement.
If others think it is worth while, I could create the Web page for ADSM
requirements.

Dave Kalenderian
M.I.T.
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>