ADSM-L

Re: Windows NT Filespace Types

1997-11-24 11:44:35
Subject: Re: Windows NT Filespace Types
From: "Boireau, Eric (MED-Cap Gemini)" <BOIREER AT EUROMSX.GEMSE DOT FR>
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 1997 17:44:35 +0100
You have the same problem, when you register a client as Win95. You
upgrade it to WinNT, it appears always as Win95 Client. I think this
kind of information is stored the first time that the client connect to
the server. May be not a big problem (NTFS account ???)


> g          GE Medical Systems 
> __________________________________
> Eric Boireau                                                GITS
> Unix / NT  System Engineer
> 
> GE Medical Systems S.A
> 283, rue de la Minière 
> 78533 BUC Cedex France
> Tél: (33) 01 30 70 39 51,  DC: 8*644 3951
> Fax: (33) 01 30 70 39 20, DC: 8*644 3920
> mailto:boireer AT euromsx.gemse DOT fr
> 
> Salutations / Best Regards
> 
> 
> 
> ----------
> From:
> Phil.Chissell AT research.natpower.co DOT uk[SMTP:Phil.Chissell AT research 
> DOT natp
> ower.co.uk] on behalf of
> Phil.Chissell[SMTP:phil.chissell AT RESEARCH.NATPOWER.CO DOT UK]
> Reply To:     ADSM: Dist Stor Manager
> Sent:         lundi 24 novembre 1997 12:32
> To:   'ADSM Forum'
> Subject:      Windows NT Filespace Types
> 
> I am running ADSM V3.1.0.1 (client and server)  on Windows NT V4
> servers.
> 
> I scheduled a backup on a client which had a mixture of NTFS and FAT
> filesystems which completed successfully.  
> 
> On the client, I then converted one of the FAT filesystem to NTFS and
> performed another backup.  This also backed up OK but when I ran a
> "query filespace" on the server, this filespace is still recorded as
> being of type FAT.
> 
> To get around this, I deleted the offending filesystem from the ADSM
> server and then rescheduled a backup on the client.  This time the
> filespace type gets recorded as NTFS.
> 
> This seems like a bug to me or is this expected behavior?
> 
> Regards
> 
> Phil
> 
> 
> Phil Chissell       phil.chissell AT research.natpower.co DOT uk
> 
> This represents the view of the author alone and is not to be
> considered as the position of National Power PLC
> 
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>