Re: Proposed compression change?
1997-11-21 05:49:20
Replying to: Peter Thomas <Peter_Thomas AT MANULIFE DOT COM> (Wed, 19 Nov 1997
13:59:49 -0500)
>The idea of allowing compression (or exclusion) based on a file type is used by
>other backup products; for instance HARBOR (used to be from New Era I believe)
>has a table that can be used to say "DON'T COMPRESS" zip, tiff, etc.
>
>The only challenge might be should this be decision be made strictly by the
>client agent, controlled by the server, or under control of the dsm.opt file.
I think this would be best in the include/exclude list. Something like:
COMPRESS YES
INCLUDE *:\...\*.tif NOCOMPRESS
As this could lead to a change on the management class assignment, we could
also use:
NOCOMPRESS *.tif
The former is more powerful as we could specify no compression on a per file
basis.
--
Rui Malheiro,
Rui Malheiro,
6 Mil - Tecnologias de Informacao
URL: <http://www.6mil.pt/>
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Proposed compression change?, Jerry Lawson
- Re: Proposed compression change?, Bill Colwell
- Re: Proposed compression change?, Kauffman, Tom
- Re: Proposed compression change?, Peter Thomas
- Re: Proposed compression change?, Daniel Thompson
- Re: Proposed compression change?,
Rui Malheiro <=
- Re: Proposed compression change?, Jerry Lawson
- Re: Proposed compression change?, Somchai Tachapornroong
- Re: Proposed compression change?, Somchai Tachapornroong
- Re: Proposed compression change?, INTERNET . OWNERAD at SNADGATE
|
|
|