ADSM-L

Re: Activity Log and Y2K

1997-06-24 08:24:44
Subject: Re: Activity Log and Y2K
From: Andrew Raibeck <storman AT US.IBM DOT COM>
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 1997 08:24:44 -0400
Yes, ADSM is Year 2000 ready. My guess is that you are running on AIX or Sun,
and that the output is being formatted in accordance with the current NLS
locale settings. If the locale is changed to show 4-digit years, ADSM should
also show 4-digit years. However, this change may impact other applications
that rely on the locale settings, so be careful before changing anything.

Andy Raibeck
ADSM Level 2 Support
---------------------- Forwarded by Andrew Raibeck/San Jose/IBM on 06-24-97
05:11 AM ---------------------------
05:11 AM ---------------------------

        ADSM-L @ VM.MARIST.EDU
        06-23-97 04:56 PM
Please respond to ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU @ internet

To: ADSM-L @ VM.MARIST.EDU @ internet
cc:
Subject: Activity Log and Y2K

The Query ACtlog output's date is always in MM/DD/YY form regardless
of the Dateformat setting.  Could IBM comment as to whether this will
be made Year 2000 compliant, or will it say "01/01/00" a couple of
years from now?        thanks, Richard Sims, BU
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>