ADSM-L

Re: Old problem, new complaints.....

1997-01-24 13:32:53
Subject: Re: Old problem, new complaints.....
From: Frank Ramke <ramke AT VNET.IBM DOT COM>
Date: Fri, 24 Jan 1997 10:32:53 -0800
Hello LAbbinante,

I've seen this complaint before, and we are changing ADSM so that
empty directories are backed up with the selective backup command.
You see, ADSM currently does backup empty directories, but ONLY if
backups are done using the incremental command. But, for various
reasons, all our users don't use the incremental command, some
use only the selective backup. Thus, the directory entries are never
backed up to start with.

Restore does currently restore empty directories, but it only does so
if the subdirectory option is used. The one caveat here is that you
currently can not restore only the empty subdirectory. It must be
contained within another directory that actually has files in it.
This too will be fixed with version 3.

Until the new function is available, via Version 3, I suggest that
you look into using the incremental command for backup.



LAbbinante wrote:
>
> I know this has been an old standing question/problem with ADSM
> restores.  However,  we recently had a restore of a 60% full 4GB
> filesystem that had 366,000 files in it, and the issue, even though it
> was KNOWN to be a limitation, has come up again.   The file system in
> question was corrupted, and HP, knowing that ADSM was our
> backup/recovery tool, said to reinitialize the filesystem and restore
> from scratch.  After the restore kicked off( which ran at about 28,000

> files/hr.  366,000/28,000=13+hrs), it was brought to my attention that
> files were being missed.  Not files, I found out, but
> directories,....empty directories.   It was decided about three hours
> into the restore to cancel it and recover a fresh unloaded
> (directories/no data) filesystem from other servers.  Needless to say,
> ADSM has been put on the spot for not only for its performance (which
> is due to it's 10mbit connection to MVS), but for the existing problem
> of not restoring empty directories.   Does anyone have an update or
> workaround, on this old, seemingly persistent problem. :-(
> Thanks,,,Larry
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>