Re: ADSM Tape Reclamation -Reply
1997-01-07 11:58:19
Try Maxprocess=4
>>> "Pittson, Timothy ,Corp/US" <tpittson AT HIMAIL.HCC DOT COM>
01/07/97 08:26am >>>
Jim
I think reclamation is single threaded so you'll only get one
reclamation process running at a time.
Tim Pittson
tpittson AT himail.hcc DOT com
>----------
>From: Jim
Kleberg[SMTP:Kleberg_James_R/svoa0001 AT SSB DOT COM]
>Sent: Tuesday, January 07, 1997 10:32 AM
>To: Multiple recipients of list ADSM-L
>Subject: ADSM Tape Reclamation
>
> We are running an MVS ADSM server (2.1.7.7) and are
testing
> reclamation of a tape storage pool by setting reclaim=60 (it
is
> normally set at 100).
>
> We had assumed that reclamation would utilize an even
number of tape
> drives up to the maximum number of drives specified in the
devclass
> mountlimit parameter (set to 8). However, we see only 2
mounts
> resulting from just a single reclamation process.
>
> Is this to be expected?
>
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- ADSM Tape Reclamation, Jim Kleberg
- Re: ADSM Tape Reclamation, Richard Flagg
- Re: ADSM Tape Reclamation, LEE FOSBRINK
- Re: ADSM Tape Reclamation, Benjamin Holzman
- Re: ADSM Tape Reclamation, Pittson, Timothy ,Corp/US
- Re: ADSM Tape Reclamation, Pittson, Timothy ,Corp/US
- Re: ADSM Tape Reclamation -Reply,
Chris Zerr <=
- Re: ADSM Tape Reclamation, Jerry Lawson
- Re: ADSM Tape Reclamation, INTERNET . OWNERAD at SNADGATE
|
|
|