ADSM-L

Re: Usefullnes of ADSM requirements page??

1996-12-06 15:22:55
Subject: Re: Usefullnes of ADSM requirements page??
From: Mike Kaczmarski <kacz AT VNET.IBM DOT COM>
Date: Fri, 6 Dec 1996 13:22:55 -0700
Ditto.

Mike Kaczmarski
ADSM Development

Dave Cannon writes:
 > Dave Crockett expressed my own sentiments very well.  The many ADSM 
 > developers
 > who follow this list do so on a voluntary basis.  We participate because we
 > are interested in what our customers have to say and want to contribute to
 > their understanding and satisfaction with the product.
 >
 > Dave Cannon
 > ADSM Development
 > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
 > >Francisco Reyes wrote:
 > >> Every time I see people making suggestions I don't know if the ADSM
 > >> team is reading.
 > >> What is your opinion?
 > >>
 > >> If IBM doesn't listen we could always send the data to their
 > >> competitors. Who knows if there was another distributed backup system
 >
 > Dave Crockett replied:
 > >This post is disappointing in light of the many overtime hours that ADSM
 > >developers do devote to this list and all the function that we have
 > >worked to deliver even between releases and versions.  I sure hope that
 > >our participation on this list is a little bit more obvious to others.