Re: loaddskf
1996-10-11 17:47:48
On Fri, 11 Oct 1996 13:36:20 -0700 you said:
>Would anyone else out there prefer to see the ptfs for OS/2, NT, etc
>packaged
>in a manner other than loaddskf? How about self extracting disk
>images? It
>would certainly make my life simpler (but not as simple as self-updating
>clients!) How about it IBM?
I'll second that!! It makes more sense that the work of creating sea's
be done once by IBM than by the hundreds of sites duplicating the effort.
Can IBM give us an offical response to this list?
Dave Kalenderian
Systems Programming Group/M.I.T.
|
|
|