Re: ADSM Performance
1996-08-28 08:38:41
=0C
> So far the Exbyte is the bottle neck on our throughput once the b=
ackup
> process starts. However it has taken up to 2 hours simply to quer=
y the
> data base for the list of files that we may need to restore. This=
data
> base problem and the tape throughput is killing us.
I had a similar problem with out lan server (around 300.000 files) a=
nd unix
systems (around 60.000 files each) all backuped with one ADSM/MVS se=
rver.
Database searches lasts very long. So I decided to split the ADSM se=
rver
into four different servers to make the databases smaller (total dat=
abase
space is equal) und so increase the performance during restores (spe=
cially
for restore -inactive ...).
Perhaps you can manage it in the same way.
best regards
Rolf Meyer
Reemstma Hamburg
rolf.meyer AT hamburg.reemtsma.atlas400 DOT de
|
|
|