ADSM-L
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: Relative importance of OS/2?

1996-08-06 17:51:03
Subject: Re: Relative importance of OS/2?
From: "Andrew M. Raibeck" <araibeck AT VNET.IBM DOT COM>
Date: Tue, 6 Aug 1996 14:51:03 PDT 
Jeff Mathers asks:

>Strange that OS/2 is not in your list of operating systems. Does this reflect
>the
>relative importance of OS/2 in the future of ADSM?

No. It's omission was accidental. Sloppy editing...

Andy Raibeck
ADSM Level 2 Support
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • Re: Relative importance of OS/2?, Andrew M. Raibeck <=
Previous by Date:  Problems using 'checkin libvol' command, Heuer Christo Datavia
Next by Date:  Re: Novell CLients Prevents Access to CCMail, Rick Tsujimoto
Previous by Thread:  Novell CLients Prevents Access to CCMail, Dale BESKE
Next by Thread:  DSMFMT error errno=27 ? ? ? ? ?, Dwight Cook
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]