ADSM-L

Reply to NO SUBJECT

1996-02-28 12:34:00
Subject: Reply to NO SUBJECT
From: Mike Stewart <STEWAJM AT AUDUCADM.DUC.AUBURN DOT EDU>
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 1996 12:34:00 -05
*** Original Author:  ADSM-L @ MARIST - ** Remote User **; 02/28/96 11:54

>Received: from VM.MARIST.EDU by AUDUCADM.DUC.AUBURN.EDU (IBM MVS SMTP V3R1)
>   with TCP; Wed, 28 Feb 96 11:54:35 CDT
>Received: from VM.MARIST.EDU by VM.MARIST.EDU (IBM VM SMTP V2R3)
>   with BSMTP id 9653; Wed, 28 Feb 96 12:49:10 EST
>Received: from VM.MARIST.EDU (NJE origin LISTSERV@MARIST) by VM.MARIST.EDU
> (LMail V1.2a/1.8a) with BSMTP id 5902; Wed, 28 Feb 1996 12:49:04 -0500
>Received: from VM.MARIST.EDU by VM.MARIST.EDU (LISTSERV release 1.8b) with NJE
>          id 8131 for ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU; Wed, 28 Feb 1996 12:48:56 
> -0500
>Received: from MARIST (NJE origin SMTP@MARIST) by VM.MARIST.EDU (LMail
>          V1.2a/1.8a) with BSMTP id 5894; Wed, 28 Feb 1996 12:48:56 -0500
>Received: from ibmmail.COM by VM.MARIST.EDU (IBM VM SMTP V2R3) with TCP; Wed,
>          28 Feb 96 12:48:42 EST
>Received: from ibmmail by ibmmail.COM (IBM VM SMTP V2R3) with BSMTP id 1639;
>          Wed, 28 Feb 96 12:51:36 EST
>MIME-Version: 1.0
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>Message-ID:  <ADSM-L%96022812485785 AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU>
>Date:         Wed, 28 Feb 1996 12:51:35 EST
>Reply-To:     "Dist. Stor. Manager(ADSM) List" <ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU>
>Sender:       "Dist. Stor. Manager(ADSM) List" <ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU>
>From:         Mike Bachert <uscgs8ts AT IBMMAIL DOT COM>
>Subject:      NO SUBJECT
>To:           Multiple recipients of list ADSM-L <ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU>
>
Subject:


We are running ADSM Server for MVS, Version 1 Release 1 Level 0.10/1.10

My site is currently running MVS 4.3 and is preparing to upgrade to
MVS 5.2.  Is anyone aware of any problems running ADSM Server related to
an MVS version change?

TIA for any comments.

*** Comments from STEWAJM - Stewart, Mike; 02/28/96 12:33pm:
We went from MVS 4.3 to 5.2 with no changes to ADSM, and
have run into no problems.
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • Reply to NO SUBJECT, Mike Stewart <=