IBM3590 SCSI PERFORMANCE (revisited)
1996-01-17 13:38:32
Subject: |
IBM3590 SCSI PERFORMANCE (revisited) |
From: |
Matthias Feyerabend <M.Feyerabend AT GSI DOT DE> |
Date: |
Wed, 17 Jan 1996 19:38:32 +0100 |
Hello,
last week I posted a message concerning performance
on our new IBM 3494 robot with IBM3590 SCSI units
under AIX attached to SP2 with Wide SCSI I/O controller.
I was comparing my figures of around 3 MB/sec using
ADSM archive/restore from local disk to attached 3590 tape
to the published rates of 9 MB/s and even 11 MB/s using
compression 3:1.
I was pointing at the difference of these numbers and was asking
if someone else has seen better figures.
In the meantime we did more measurements with the following results:
reading from (local) disk is a bottle neck which cuts performance at 3 MB/s
(This applies to ADSM and other programs like dd)
reading from (local) disk with memset comes up to 7 MB/s (100 MB, 64 K blocks)
writing from memory to 3590 tape comes up to 7.8 MB/s (200 MB data, 128 K
blocks)
you can improve this to 8.7 MB/s setting compression off on the device
with compression on and compactable data 2:1 you can get 11.7 MB/s (200 MB
data, 256 K blocks)
ADSM maximum rate I got was 5.6 MB/s for transfer from tape to tape
These rates show that SCSI connection and IBM3590 can work at the
claimed performance.
There is however a restriction that
memory to tape is needed to get max numbers,
and hardware compaction=on with uncompactable data
downgrades the performance.
By the way a last question:
The time needed to close the tape after writing one file
seems to depend from the filesize
(from 8 sec for 100 MB to 13.5 sec for 200 MB).
Why ??
Thank you for listening.
------------------------------------------------------------
Matthias Feyerabend phone: (49) 6159 71-2519
Matthias Feyerabend phone: (49) 6159 71-2519
GSI, Darmstadt internet: M.Feyerabend AT gsi DOT de
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread> |
- IBM3590 SCSI PERFORMANCE (revisited),
Matthias Feyerabend <=
|
|
|